Legal Opinion
Simpson v. Cenarrusa
Idaho Supreme Court
Decided August 7, 1997No. Docket 23526PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
944 P.2d 1372 (1997)
130 Idaho 609
In the Matter of the Application and Petition for Writ of Prohibition and Declaratory Judgment.
Michael K. SIMPSON, Jerry T. Twiggs, Maynard M. Miller, Bruce Sweeney, Marguerite Mc Laughlin, Jim D. Kempton, Laird Noh, Wendy Jaquet, Golden C. Linford and Reed Hanson, Petitioners,
v.
Pete T. CENARRUSA, Secretary of State of the state of Idaho, Respondent, and
Citizens for Federal Term Limits, Respondent-Real Party in Interest.
Docket No. 23526
Supreme Court of Idaho. Boise, May 1997 Term.
August 7, 1997.
Evans Keane, Boise; Park, Redford, Thomas & Burkett, Boise, for…
Also in this document: Concurrence · Silak; Concurrence · Schroeder.
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Anderson v. CelebrezzeSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Tenney v. BrandhoveSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Burdick v. TakushiSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Bullock v. CarterSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Illinois State Board of Elections v. Socialist Workers PartySupreme Court of the United States · 1979
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Assn. v. PadillaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2016
- Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Assn. v. PadillaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2016