Newman v. Van Nortwick
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal from an order of the superior court for King county, Gilliam, J., entered August 11, 1916, denying a motion to discharge a receiver, in hn action to foreclose a mortgage.
1Opinion of the Court
Morris, J. —
Appeal from an order refusing to discharge a receiver, in an action to foreclose a mortgage on real property. The conceded facts are: That the property is worth less than the amount due on the mortgage; that there is no provision for any deficiency judgment; that the re*490ceiver has collected $1,465.01 from rentals; that the property is well rented and well cared for; that the owners of the property had permitted delinquent taxes to accumulate to the sum of $1,712.09, now drawing interest at fifteen per cent per annum. With these facts before it, the lower court denied a motion to…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Schreiber v. CareyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1880
- Norfor v. BusbyWashington Supreme Court · 1898
- State v. ErvingWashington Supreme Court · 1898
- Winkler v. MagdeburgWisconsin Supreme Court · 1898
- Gerber v. HeathWashington Supreme Court · 1916
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Straus v. Wilsonian Investment Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1933
- Grieve v. HuberWyoming Supreme Court · 1928
- Boucher Investments, L.P. v. Annapolis-West Limited PartnershipCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2001
- Travelers Insurance v. 633 Third AssociatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1993
- Lich v. StrohmWashington Supreme Court · 1925
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.