Legal Opinion

Straus v. Wilsonian Investment Co.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided January 12, 1933No. 24115. Department TwoPublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMain, J.

This is an appeal from an order appointing a receiver in an action to foreclose a mortgage.

The following is a statement of facts, about which there is no controversy. The property against which foreclosure is sought is owned by appellant and operated by it as a hotel. Appellant acquired title from the mortgagors, George W. Wilson and Corinne Simpson Wilson, without assuming the mortgage. The Wilsons are both deceased, and their estates are hopelessly insolvent. The balance due on the mortgage is approximately $310,000, and the property is worth not to exceed $240,000.

At the time the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Newman v. Van NortwickWashington Supreme Court · 1917

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. The Travelers Insurance Company v. 633 Third AssociatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
  2. The Travelers Insurance Company v. 633 Third AssociatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1992
  3. Straus v. Wilsonian Investment Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1934
  4. Travelers Insurance v. 633 Third AssociatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
  5. Boucher Investments, L.P. v. Annapolis-West Limited PartnershipCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2001

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API