Legal Opinion
County of Trinity v. Andrus
District Court, E.D. California
Decided December 15, 1977No. S-77-343-PCWPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR NEW TRIAL
RENFREW, District Judge, Sitting by Designation.
Final judgment in this action having been entered in favor of defendants on October 27,1977, plaintiff County of Trinity filed on November 3, 1977, a timely motion for a new trial on grounds of newly discovered evidence. Pursuant to stipulation and order, the motion was submitted to the Court without argument on November 30, 1977, on the basis of the parties’ briefs, the affidavit of Earl S. Wolcott, III, filed November 3, 1977, and the affidavit of Felix E. Smith, filed November 21, 1977. After careful…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Eugene Baynum v. Chesapeake and Ohio Railway CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1972
- Seymour R. Rayor v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1963
- Ursini v. Menninger FoundationDistrict Court, E.D. California · 1974
3Cited by4 opinions
- Strobl v. New York Mercantile ExchangeDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1984
- Miller v. Cudahy Co.District Court, D. Kansas · 1987
- Ferrari v. Bonardi (In re Auburn Medical Realty)District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1980
- Hudson's Bay Co. Fur Sales v. American Legend CooperativeDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1987