Legal Opinion

Seymour R. Rayor v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided October 8, 1963No. 18653PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

We dismissed appellant’s appeal for what we thought obvious reasons. His vigorous petition for rehearing persuades us we should reply in some detail.

Rule 33 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure requires a motion for a new trial based on any other ground than newly discovered evidence to be made within five days after verdict or finding of guilty, or within such further time as the court may fix during the five days period.

Rule 34 (to be hereinafter discussed) requires a motion in arrest of judgment to “be made within 5 days after determination of guilt or within such further time as the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Lott v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  2. United States v. BransenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1944
  3. Marion v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1948
  4. Pugh v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1952
  5. Aerated Products Co. v. Aeration Processes, Inc.District Court, S.D. California · 1951

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. William C. Siravo v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1967
  2. United States v. Joseph Divarco and Joseph ArnoldCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1973
  3. United States v. Eugene H. PinkneyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1976
  4. Del Rogers v. OggArizona Supreme Court · 1966
  5. Edward Jaben v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1965

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API