Legal Opinion

Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance Co. v. Henry

Court of Appeals of Tennessee

Decided June 25, 1982PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FRANKS, Judge.

In this interpleader action, the chancellor resolved the dispute between decedent’s former wife and his parents by holding the parents had been properly designated as decedent’s beneficiaries under the group life insurance policy. The former wife, Catherine V. Henry, has appealed.

*411Before considering the merits of the appeal, we consider a motion to dismiss filed by appellee on the grounds appellant has perfected her appeal by filing a pauper’s oath and is a resident of Georgia. T.R.A.P., Rule 18(b), requires a party who desires to proceed as a poor person on appeal to…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Cronbach v. Aetna Life Ins. Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1925
  2. Page v. Detroit Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1929
  3. Davis v. DavisTennessee Supreme Court · 1916
  4. Life & Casualty Insurance v. CornishCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1958
  5. National Life & Accident Ins. v. BryantCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1943

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Sun Life Assurance Co. of Canada v. HicksCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1992
  2. Public Employees Benefit Services Corp. v. ParminterCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2001
  3. Public Employees v. Alana ParminterCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API