Legal Opinion

Cronbach v. Aetna Life Ins. Co.

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided December 6, 1925PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice McKinney

Mrs. Cronbach, by her bill, sought a decree against the defendant company on eight policies of $5,000 eách issued upon the life of her husband, Joseph Cronbach, upon the theory that, prior to his death, he had taken such action as to make her the sole beneficiary under said policies.

The chancellor dismissed her bill, and, upon appeal, his decree was affirmed by the court of appeals.

About a month before the death of the insured he had procured the company to change the beneficiary clauses in said policies so as to provide that the company should pay monthly interest on the principal, at the…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Freund v. FreundIllinois Supreme Court · 1905
  2. Fink v. . FinkNew York Court of Appeals · 1902
  3. Indiana National Life Insurance v. McGinnisIndiana Supreme Court · 1913
  4. Schoenholz v. . New York Life Ins. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1922
  5. Thomas v. . ThomasNew York Court of Appeals · 1892

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Union Planters National Leasing, Inc. v. Roderick D. WoodsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1982
  2. V. L. Nicholson Co. v. Transcon Investment & Financial Ltd.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Garabrant v. BurnsTexas Supreme Court · 1938
  4. Sevier Cnty. Schs. Fed. Credit Union v. Branch Banking & Trust Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2021
  5. Lass v. EliassenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API