Legal Opinion

Attorney General ex rel. Trahair v. Landel Metropolitan District

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 27, 1947No. Docket No. 85, Calendar No. 43,742PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBoyles, J.

This case involves the construction of sections 6 and 8 of Act No. 312, Pub. Acts 1929 (1 Comp. Laws 1929, § 2275 et seq. [Stat. Ann. § 5.2131 et seq.]), called the metropolitan district act, and relates to the proceedings for incorporation of a metropolitan district. Plaintiff, by leave of the attorney general, has filed in this Court an information in the nature of quo warranto to require the *378defendants to show cause by what warrant the defendant Landeh Metropolitan District claims to be a body corporate and by what warrant the other defendants claim to exercise the powprs and privileges of…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Hay v. AldersonMontana Supreme Court · 1914
  2. City of Jackson v. Com'r of RevenueMichigan Supreme Court · 1947
  3. Knoxville Water Co. v. KnoxvilleSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
  4. Nixon v. City of BurlingtonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1908
  5. Knoxville v. Knoxville Water Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1901

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Michigan Public Service Co. v. City of CheboyganMichigan Supreme Court · 1949
  2. Kalamazoo Township v. Kalamazoo County ClerkMichigan Supreme Court · 1954
  3. Attorney General Ex Rel. Reuter v. City of Bay CityMichigan Supreme Court · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API