Legal Opinion

Knoxville v. Knoxville Water Co.

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided November 2, 1901PublishedCited by 19 opinions

FROM KNOX. Appeal in error from Circuit Court of Knox County. Joseph W. SNeed, J.

1Opinion of the CourtWilkes, J.

This suit arises out of an effort upon the part of the city of Knoxville to enforce an ordinance which affects the defendant water company, and, as it claims, seriously interferes with its operations, and unlawfully encroaches upon its franchises and vested rights. The water company has a valuable plant at Knoxville, which it has erected and operated under contracts and ordinances made by the city of Knoxville, and it has valuable franchises in the furnishing of water to the city and people. The relative rights of the city and water company, and their obligations, one to the other, appear to…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Walla Walla City v. Walla Walla Water Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1898
  2. Stone v. MississippiSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
  3. Providence Bank v. BillingsSupreme Court of the United States · 1830
  4. Stone v. Farmers' Loan & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1886
  5. Butchers' Union Slaughter-House & Live-Stock Landing Co. v. Crescent City Live-Stock Landing & Slaughter-House Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1884

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Tennessee Electric Power Co. v. City of ChattanoogaTennessee Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Spencer-Sturla Co. v. City of MemphisTennessee Supreme Court · 1927
  3. City of Uvalde v. Uvalde Electric & Ice Co.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1923
  4. Stearns v. State Ex Rel. BiggersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
  5. City of St. Paul v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1915

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API