Legal Opinion
Attorney General Ex Rel. Reuter v. City of Bay City
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided September 5, 1952No. Docket 66, Calendar 45,433PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtButzel, J.
The city of Bay City is chartered and operates under the provisions of the home-rule act (CL 1948, § 117.1 et seq. [Stat Ann 1949 Rev § 5.2071 et seg.]). Its charter, prior to the purported election hereinafter referred to, provided for a board of health composed of 5 members, 3 of whom were to be duly licensed'physicians, with the power in the city commission to make such appointments.
A charter amendment providing that the board should be composed of 5 members, 1 of whom was to be a licensed physician, 1 a licensed dentist, and 1 a licensed osteopath was proposed by initiatory petition and…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Oakland County Drain Com'r v. City of Royal OakMichigan Supreme Court · 1943
- Finlayson v. Township of West BloomfieldMichigan Supreme Court · 1948
- Line v. Board of Election CanvassersMichigan Supreme Court · 1908
- Youells v. MorrishMichigan Supreme Court · 1922
- Anderson v. LevinMichigan Supreme Court · 1922
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Grand Rapids City Clerk v. Judge of Superior CourtMichigan Supreme Court · 1962
- Stokes v. Clerk of Monroe County CanvassersMichigan Court of Appeals · 1970
- Gallagher v. KeefeMichigan Court of Appeals · 1999
- Gallagher v. KeefeMichigan Court of Appeals · 1999