Legal Opinion

People v. Brown

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 3, 2009PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (McKay, J.), entered April 19, 2007, as, after a hearing, designated him a level two sex offender pursuant to Correction Law article 6-C.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements.

In establishing the appropriate risk level determination under the Sex Offender Registration Act (Correction Law art 6-C), the People bear the burden of proving the necessary facts by clear and convincing evidence (see Correction Law § 168-n [3]; People v…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. People v. HardyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
  2. People v. WrightAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
  3. People v. LawlessAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
  4. People v. TaylorAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
  5. People v. BoltonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. People v. WyattAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
  2. People v. ParisiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2023
  3. People v. DeJesusAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
  4. People v. PerezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
  5. People v. SamAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API