Church v. Collins
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Sonoma County. Emmet Seawell, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtHart, J.
The plaintiff brought this action to recover damages for the breach of an alleged agreement for the sale of certain real property.
A general demurrer to the complaint was sustained, and this appeal is by the plaintiff from the judgment entered after and upon the order sustaining the demurrer.
It appears that, on January 17, 1911, the defendant and the firm of Lyman & Briggs, real estate brokers at Sebastopol, in Sonoma county, entered into a written agreement by the terms of which the former constituted the latter as his agents for the sale of the property described in said agreement. Acting…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Armstrong v. LoweCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
- Bacon v. DavisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1908
- Rutenberg v. MainCalifornia Supreme Court · 1874
- Stemler v. BassCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
3Cited by10 opinions
- Holway v. MalloyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945
- Landskroener v. HenningMichigan Supreme Court · 1923
- Salter v. IvesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
- Martin v. BairdCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
- Mason v. MazelCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.