Legal Opinion
Mason v. Mazel
California Court of Appeal
Decided December 9, 1947No. Civ. 15892PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWood, J.
In this action for specific performance, plaintiffs appeal from a judgment for defendant. The judgment followed a ruling of the court sustaining, without leave to amend, an objection by defendant to the introduction of evidence upon the ground that the second amended complaint, upon which the case was called for trial, did not state a cause of action.
The second amended complaint (referred to herein as the complaint) alleged in substance that plaintiff Tatum was a licensed real estate broker; that defendant was the owner of certain real property located in Los Angeles County; that on April 26,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Bacon v. DavisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1908
- Stemler v. BassCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
- Holway v. MalloyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945
- Church v. CollinsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1912
- Slater v. RauerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
3Cited by7 opinions
- Van't Rood v. County of Santa ClaraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
- Rhode v. BartholomewCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
- People Ex Rel. Department of Public Works v. Glen Arms Estate, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1964
- Angus v. LondonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
- Freeman v. JerginsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.