Salter v. Ives
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. Tracy Chatfield Becker, and Herbert J. Goudge, for Appellant.
1Opinion of the CourtMelvin, J.
Plaintiff sued to quiet title to certain property in the city of Los Angeles. Defendant Ives answered, asserting that he had obtained a lease of the property from one Toombs, who, as he alleged, was duly authorized to make such contract by the plaintiff. Ives also by cross-complaint sought specific performance of this alleged lease. The court sustained a demurrer to the amended answer and cross-complaint of Ives, and upon his failure to amend further, judgment was entered by default. Prom that judgment defendant and cross-complainant appeals.
The only question involved in this appeal is…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Duffy v. HobsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1870
- Carstens v. McReavyWashington Supreme Court · 1890
- Armstrong v. LoweCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
- Grant v. EdeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
- Pierce v. MerrillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Landskroener v. HenningMichigan Supreme Court · 1923
- Purdy v. Buffums, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1928
- Schmitt v. GriptonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1926
- Thompson v. SchollCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1916
- Sackett v. StarrCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.