Legal Opinion
Lowe v. Pogue
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided March 29, 1999No. 98-7591PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
526 U.S. 273 (1999)
LOWE
v.
POGUE et al.
No. 98-7591.
United States Supreme Court.
Decided March 29, 1999.[*]
ON MOTION FOR LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS
2Per curiam
Pro se petitioner Lowe seeks leave to proceed in forma pauperis under Rule 39 of this Court. We deny this request pursuant to Rule 39.8. Lowe is allowed until April 19, 1999, within which to pay the docketing fee required by Rule 38 and to submit his petitions in compliance with this Court's Rule 33.1. We also direct the Clerk not to accept any further petitions for certiorari nor petitions for extraordinary writs from Lowe in noncriminal…
Also in this document: Dissent.
3Cases cited6 opinions
- Almeida-Sanchez v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Martin v. District of Columbia Court of AppealsSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Burch v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- United States v. Donovan Dwayne Oliver Darryl Lee McMillan Nathaniel JonesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- In re LoweSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by2 opinions
- Lowe v. CantrellCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1999
- Corley v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1999