Legal Opinion
Corley v. United States
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided September 17, 1999No. 94-CO-58, 97-CO-184PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SCHWELB, Associate Judge:
On May 6, 1999, the United States filed a motion seeking sanctions against Roger H. Corley, Jr., for abuse of the processes of this court. On June 7, 1999, the Clerk received Corley’s pro se motion to strike the government’s motion for sanctions. In a brief memorandum in support of his motion to strike, Corley referred to an “Attached Motion/Brief in opposition and objection to Appellees’ Motion for Sanctions and Memorandum in support.” The purported attachments did not accompany Corley’s motion to strike.
On June 16, 1999, the Chief Deputy Clerk of this court advised…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- North Carolina v. AlfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Martin v. District of Columbia Court of AppealsSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- In re McDonaldSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- In Re Anthony R. Martin-Trigona, Movant. In Re George Sassower, MovantCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1993
- In Re McDonaldSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Corley v. United States Parole CommissionDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2009
- Ibrahim v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2000
- Corley v. United States Parole CommissionDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2009