Legal Opinion

Yarnevic v. Apfel

District Court, N.D. Georgia

Decided February 18, 2005No. 4:01-cv-00043PublishedCited by 59 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

CAMP, District Judge.

Pending before the Court is Plaintiffs Motion for Attorney’s Fees under the Social Security Act [# 17]. The Court GRANTS the motion.

I. Background

Plaintiff filed this action on January 4, 2001, seeking judicial review of Defendant’s denial of his claim for disability insurance benefits. On September 27, 2001, the Court reversed and remanded the case to Defendant for further proceedings. On remand, Plaintiff successfully obtained an award of $112,231 in past due benefits. Defendant withheld $28,057.75 from this amount to pay any attorney fees awarded to Plaintiffs…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Gisbrecht v. BarnhartSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  2. Hearn v. BarnhartDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2003
  3. Claypool v. BarnhartDistrict Court, S.D. West Virginia · 2003
  4. Coppett v. BarnhartDistrict Court, S.D. Georgia · 2002
  5. Brown v. BarnhartDistrict Court, W.D. Virginia · 2003

3Cited by59 opinions

  1. Garcia v. AstrueDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2007
  2. McPeak v. BarnhartDistrict Court, S.D. West Virginia · 2005
  3. Ellick v. BarnhartDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2006
  4. Siraco v. AstrueDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2011
  5. Thomas v. BarnhartDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 2005

54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API