Legal Opinion
Garcia v. Astrue
District Court, C.D. California
Decided August 7, 2007No. CV 00-8240-RCPublishedCited by 52 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR ATTORNEY’S FEES UNDER 42 U.S.C. § 406(b)
ROSALYN M. CHAPMAN, United States Magistrate Judge.
On June 22, 2007, plaintiff Osvaldo Garcia filed a motion for attorney’s fees under 42 U.S.C. § 406(b), a supporting memorandum of points and authorities and the supporting declaration of his counsel, James P. Shea, with exhibits. On July 9, 2007, defendant filed his response to plaintiffs motion, and plaintiff did not file a reply. This motion is decided in Chambers without oral argument, pursuant to Local Rule 7-15.
BACKGROUND
On April 2, 1991, plaintiff applied for…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Gisbrecht v. BarnhartSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- McGraw v. BarnhartCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2006
- Hearn v. BarnhartDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2003
- Rodriquez v. BowenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1989
- Jeffrey J. Biggs v. Cal A. Terhune, Director of Wbs/jfm CDC California Board of Prison Terms Board of Prison TermsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by52 opinions
- Chapa v. AstrueDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2011
- (SS) Alcala v. Commissioner of Social SecurityDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2022
- (SS) Allen v. Commissioner of Social SecurityDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2025
- (SS) Anderson v. Commissioner of Social SecurityDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2020
- (SS) Armstrong v. Commissioner of Social SecurityDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2020
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.