Estate of Connelly v. Snohomish County Public Utility District No. 1
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the CourtLau, J.
¶1 We are again asked to interpret Washington’s claim filing statute, chapter 4.96 RCW, governing claims for damages against local governmental entities. The legislature amended the claim filing statute in 2006 to preclude local governmental entities from raising defenses under the statute when they have not appointed an agent to receive claims for damages. Here, the Lake Stevens School District did not appoint an agent to receive claims against it. The district argues nonetheless that because Connelly’s estate served its claim on the wrong person, it failed to toll the statute of…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- State v. J.P.Washington Supreme Court · 2003
- Human Rights Commission v. Cheney School District No. 30Washington Supreme Court · 1982
- Citizens for Responsible Wildlife Management v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 2003
- Troxell v. RAINIER PUBLIC SCHOOL DIST. 307Washington Supreme Court · 2005
- Troxell v. Rainier Public School District No. 307Washington Supreme Court · 2005
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Mavis v. King County Public Hospital District No. 2Court of Appeals of Washington · 2011
- Mavis v. KING COUNTY PUBLIC HOSP. NO. 2Court of Appeals of Washington · 2011
- Miller v. SawantDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2022
- William Rumburg, et ux v. Ferry County PUD 1Court of Appeals of Washington · 2017
- William Rumburg, et ux v. Ferry County PUD 1Court of Appeals of Washington · 2017