Legal Opinion

State v. Toro

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided April 10, 2001No. AC 20726PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*636 Opinion

DRANGINIS, J.

The defendant, Angel Toro, appeals from the judgment of conviction, rendered after a jury trial, of robbery in the second degree in violation of General Statutes § 53a-135, robbery by carjacking in violation of General Statutes § 53a-136a and larceny in the second degree in violation of General Statutes § 53a-123. On appeal, the defendant claims that his conviction was not supported by sufficient evidence of a taking as required under each of the counts charged and, therefore, violates his state and federal constitutional rights to due process. We affirm the judgment of…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. GoldingSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
  2. State v. AdamsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
  3. State v. BradleyConnecticut Appellate Court · 2000
  4. State v. HicksConnecticut Appellate Court · 2000
  5. State v. GarciaConnecticut Appellate Court · 1995

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. JenningsConnecticut Appellate Court · 2011
  2. State v. OrtaConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
  3. State v. HenryConnecticut Appellate Court · 2005
  4. State v. HightowerConnecticut Appellate Court · 2004
  5. State v. SmithConnecticut Appellate Court · 2004

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API