Legal Opinion

Walzer v. Walzer

New York Court of Appeals

Decided May 16, 1957PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtVan Voorhis, J.

The questions certified require us to decide whether or not the complaint should have been dismissed on motion for summary judgment. The action is brought against the estate of an insured by the beneficiaries of three life insurance policies, who seek to be reimbursed on account of an indebtedness owing by the decedent to a bank which collected from the proceeds of his life insurance instead of from his estate. Special Term held that the beneficiaries under these policies must bear the burden of paying this indebtedness. Upon the other hand, these insurance beneficiaries contend that the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Aron v. GillmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1955
  2. Chamberlin v. First Trust & Deposit Co.New York Supreme Court · 1939
  3. In re the Estate of KelleyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1937
  4. In re the Accounting of LandauNew York Surrogate's Court · 1951
  5. In re the Accounting of Lincoln Rochester Trust Co.New York Surrogate's Court · 1948

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Livingston v. SheltonWashington Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Rountree v. FrazeeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1968
  3. In Re Estate of MundellDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984
  4. Livingston v. SheltonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1974
  5. Sanders v. CowanDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API