Legal Opinion
Chamberlin v. First Trust & Deposit Co.
New York Supreme Court
Decided November 1, 1939PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtKimball, J.
The facts are not in dispute. The plaintiff is the widow of Gardner J. Chamberlin and the designated beneficiary in the two policies upon his life in the Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United States, one in the amount of $10,000 *473and the other in the amount of $12,000. The defendant is the executor of the last will and testament of said Chamberlin. On May 11, 1938, the decedent made and delivered his promissory note to the Syracuse Trust Company whereby he agreed to pay upon demand the sum of $20,000 which on that day he borrowed. By the terms of the note he “ pledged as collateral…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Barbin v. MooreSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1932
- Davis v. Modern Industrial BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1939
- Katz v. Ohio National BankOhio Supreme Court · 1934
- In re the Estate of KelleyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1937
3Cited by15 opinions
- Doris Filner v. Samuel Shapiro and Southwestern Alloys CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1980
- In re the Accounting of LandauNew York Surrogate's Court · 1951
- Walzer v. WalzerNew York Court of Appeals · 1957
- In re the Accounting of Lincoln Rochester Trust Co.New York Surrogate's Court · 1948
- Friedlander v. ScheerNew York Supreme Court · 1952
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.