Scott v. Woodworth
California Court of Appeal
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court,
1Opinion of the CourtHart, J.
It is agreed by counsel for the respective parties hereto that this is an action to quiet title.
The amended complaint alleges: “That on or about the third day of January, 1908, plaintiff’s grantors, August A. Lueger, sometimes called A. Lueger, and Hedwig Voightlander, nee Lueger, were the owners in fee of all that certain lot, piece and parcel of land situated, lying and being in the township of Analy, county of Sonoma and state of California, and bounded and particularly described as follows, to wit:” There follows a description of certain land, to which reference will hereafter in this…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- McMillan v. RichardsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1858
- Best v. WohlfordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
- Fogarty v. SawyerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1861
- Moss v. ShearCalifornia Supreme Court · 1866
- Barker v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1899
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Carman v. AthearnCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
- Hanlon v. Western Loan & Building Co.California Court of Appeal · 1941
- Plott v. KittelsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1929
- Saterstrom v. Glick Bros. Sash Etc. Co.California Court of Appeal · 1931
- United Truckmen, Inc. v. LorentzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.