Wood v. Blaney
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Santa Clara County and from an order denying a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Searls, C.
This is an action to recover $500 alleged to have been received by defendant, as the broker and agent of plaintiffs, in the sale of certain real estate, and converted to his own use.
The cause was tried by the court, and written findings filed upon which judgment was entered in favor of the defendant.
Plaintiffs appeal from the judgment and from an order denying their motion for a new trial.
The testimony and findings show that plaintiffs were the owners of a forty-four acre tract of land lying near *293San Jose in the county of Santa Clara, and, being desirous of selling the same,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Welland Canal Co. v. HathawayNew York Supreme Court · 1832
- Martin v. ZellerbachCalifornia Supreme Court · 1869
- Phelps v. BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
- Bogart v. Crosby & Van HarenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
- Bleven v. FreerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1858
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Helene Marceau Sidebotham v. W. L. Robison, Administrator of the Estate of Robert Sidebotham, Deceased, and Robert Sidebotham and James SidebothamCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1955
- Haigler v. DonnellyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- City of Hollister v. Monterey InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
- Davin v. DowlingWashington Supreme Court · 1927
- Bisconer v. BillingCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.