Legal Opinion

Besler v. Eldorado Cleaners, Inc.

New York Supreme Court

Decided December 13, 1932PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHammer, J.

This motion is for an order, pursuant to rule 109 of the Rules of Civil Practice, subdivision 6 thereof, striking out the first, second, third and fourth separate and distinct defenses contained in the answer of the defendant Yungert herein, on the ground that each of said defenses consisted of new matter and is insufficient in law. The action is to foreclose a mortgage given to plaintiff by defendant Eldorado Cleaners, Inc. Defendant Yungert in his third separate defense claims his purchase-money mortgage is superior and prior, in that the subordination agreement between him and Eldorado…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Gray v. . BartonNew York Court of Appeals · 1873
  2. Baird v. BairdNew York Court of Appeals · 1895
  3. Union Dime Savings Institution v. WilmotNew York Court of Appeals · 1883
  4. Carter, Macy Co. v. MatthewsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1927
  5. Baird v. BairdNew York Supreme Court · 1894

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Ackerman v. Rubber2gold, Inc. (In Re Coletta)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. New York · 2008
  2. Wainco Funding v. LogiudiceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API