Legal Opinion
Goldberg v. Raleigh Manufacturers, Inc.
District Court, D. Massachusetts
Decided July 25, 1939No. 240PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FORD, District Judge.
The plaintiff, on July 22, 1939, filed a motion in the above entitled case, presumably pursuant to Rule 30(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A. following section 723c, that he be not required to submit to the taking of a deposition upon oral examination and assigned' as the reasons therefor, the following:
“1. The plaintiff objects to the taking of such deposition on the ground that the defendant’s • request is too broad in its scope and places no limit upon the extent to which such oral examination might be carried.
“2. That the defendant can obtain by…
2Cited by7 opinions
- Blake v. CleinMississippi Supreme Court · 2005
- Samuel Goldwyn, Inc. v. United Artists CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1940
- Coutrakon v. DistenfieldAppellate Court of Illinois · 1959
- Intercontinental Fibres, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1972
- Civil Aeronautics Board of Civil Aeronautics Authority v. Canadian Colonial Airways, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1940
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.