Legal Opinion
Coutrakon v. Distenfield
Appellate Court of Illinois
Decided April 30, 1959No. Gen. 10,203PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PRESIDING JUSTICE ROETH
delivered the opinion of the court.
On September 12,1956, plaintiff filed a complaint to recover a real estate broker’s commission. Thereafter on October 29, 1956, defendant filed his motion to make the complaint more definite and certain in five specified particulars. The events following the foregoing give rise to the controversy in this case. The record shows that during April of 1957 the attorneys for plaintiff contacted one of the attorneys for defendant who was handling the case for defendant and advised him that attorneys for plaintiff desired to take the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Hammond Packing Co. v. ArkansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1909
- Robert J. Gill v. Julius Stolow and Harry Stolow, Copartners, Doing Business Under the Firm Name and Style of J. & H. StolowCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1957
- Peitzman v. City of IllmoCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1944
- James F. Fischer v. Dover Steamship Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1955
- Leo T. Mooney v. Central Motor Lines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1955
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Gillespie v. Norfolk & Western Railway Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1968
- Gallo v. HenkeAppellate Court of Illinois · 1982
- Stowers v. CarpAppellate Court of Illinois · 1961
- Tidwell v. SmithAppellate Court of Illinois · 1960
- Serpe v. Yellow Cab Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1973
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.