Legal Opinion

Schultz v. Kuerschner

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided October 8, 1957PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCurrie, J.

The following issues are raised by the appellant on this appeal:(1) Was the policy upon the life of the surviving partner a partnership asset and therefore covered by the executor’s bill of sale to Kuerschner ?(2) If not a partnership asset, may the executor rescind the release of assignment and the reassignment of the policy to Kuerschner thus taking advantage of his own unilateral mistake ?(3) Was the executor guilty of laches so as to bar him from obtaining the relief sought in this proceeding?

As to the first issue, the triál court made a definite finding that the policy in question was an…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Park & Tilford Import Corp. v. NashCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1934
  2. Town of Greenfield v. Village of West MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1956
  3. Stearns v. RobertsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1956

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. S. D. Realty Co. v. Sewerage Commission of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Hahn v. Walworth CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1961
  3. Sipple v. ZimmermanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1968
  4. Yocherer v. Farmers Insurance ExchangeWisconsin Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Korleski v. Estate of KorleskiWisconsin Supreme Court · 1964

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API