Varco-Pruden Div. AMCA International Corp. v. Hansen

John Hansen appeals from an order of the circuit court denying his motion to set aside an execution sale of real estate. The issue is whether Hansen's motion was timely, having been brought after the expiration of the one-year redemption period of sec. 815.39, Stats.,1 but within the fifteen-month redemption *268period of sec. 815.44(2)2 and before he was divested of title to the real estate under sec. 815.54.3 Because we conclude that Hansen's motion was not timely, we affirm.

On February 23, 1987, Varco-Pruden obtained a judgment against Hansen for $20,171.49 and sought to have the judgment…