Columbia Nat. Sand Dredging Co. v. Washed Bar Sand Dredging Co.
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Pennsylvania
In Equity. Suit for appointment of a receiver. On final hearing.
1Opinion of the Court
HOLLAND, District Judge.
This is a bill in equity filed asking for the appointment of a receiver. The plaintiff, on the 1st day of October, 1892, was the owner of a patent for a sand dredging machine, which had been issued to James H. Miller, and Joseph G. Patterson, of Philadelphia, entered into an agreement with it on the above-mentioned date, in which it was agreed that Patterson *711would organize a corporation to operate in the Delaware River and Bay and tributaries thereto in dredging for sand, and that a machine for that purpose should be built, using the patent of Miller, for which the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Hawes v. OaklandSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
- Dodge v. WoolseySupreme Court of the United States · 1856
- Ervin v. Oregon Ry. & Nav. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1886
- Cowan v. Pennsylvania Plate Glass Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1898
- Wolf v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1900
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- McDougall v. Huntingdon & Broad Top R. & C. Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
- Henry v. IdeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1922
- Morton v. Morton Realty Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1925
- Myers v. Occidental Oil Corp.District Court, D. Delaware · 1923
- Brent v. B. E. Brister Sawmill Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1912
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.