State v. Madry
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
LEWIS, Judge.
The only issue before us is the validity of the warrant allegedly charging defendant with the crime of taking bear with bait, in violation of N.C. Gen. Stat. § 113-294(cl). Defendant was convicted in district court but appealed to the superior court for a trial de novo. Defendant then filed a motion to dismiss the warrant as insufficient, which motion was granted. The State now appeals.
To be sufficient, any charging instrument, whether an indictment, arrest warrant, or otherwise, must allege all essential elements of the crime sought to be charged. N.C. Gen. Stat. § 15A-924(a)(5)…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- State v. WestbrooksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1996
- State v. PolkSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
- State v. AinsworthCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1993
- State v. HundleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
- State v. BohannonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1975
3Cited by9 opinions
- State v. BaskinCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2008
- State v. OsborneCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002
- State v. BallanceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2012
- State v. GarciaCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001
- State v. FullerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2006
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.