Legal Opinion

Montauk Ice Cream Co. v. Daigger Co.

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided February 26, 1925PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Cbgmp, P.,

delivered the opinion of the court.

This is an action by notice of motion instituted in the lower court by the defendant in error against the plaintiff in error. The notice of motion was as follows:

*689 “Notice of Motion.

“To the Montauk Ice Cream Company, Inc., a corporation :
“Take notice that the undersigned, the Daigger Company, .a corporation, duly organized and existing, successor of A. Daigger & Company, will, on Monday, the 12th day of March, 1923, between the hours of 10 A. M. and 2 P. M. of that day, or as soon thereafter as it can be heard, move the Court of Law and Chancery for…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Geoghegan Sons & Co. v. Arbuckle Bros.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1924
  2. Ellis & Meyers Lumber Co. v. HubbardSupreme Court of Virginia · 1918
  3. Acme Food Co. v. OlderWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1908
  4. American Hide & Leather Co. v. Chalkley & Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1903
  5. Virginia Hardwood Lumber Co. v. HughesSupreme Court of Virginia · 1924

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. East Coast Oil Co., S. A. v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1934
  2. Birdsong & Co. v. American Peanut Corp.Court of Appeals of Virginia · 1928
  3. Victor Products Corp. v. Yates-American Mach. Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1932
  4. East Coast Oil Co., S. A. v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API