American Hide & Leather Co. v. Chalkley & Co.
Supreme Court of Virginia
Error to two judgments of the Circuit Court of the city of Richmond, rendered Eebruary 15, 1902, in two actions of assumpsit, wherein the defendant in error was the plaintiff, and the plaintiff in error was the defendant.
1Opinion of the CourtWhittle, J.
The defendant in error, Chalkley & Co., instituted two actions of assumpsit in the Circuit Court of the city of Richmond against the plaintiff in error, the American Hide & Leather Company, to recover in one case $1,349.13, the differ*460ence between tbe contract price of a lot of hides sold by defendant in error to plaintiff in error, which tbe latter declined to receive, and tbe price realized therefrom on subsequent sales; and in tbe other to recover $2,000—$1,737.86, part thereof, tbe difference between tbe contract price for another lot of bides to be shipped to Bayard, W. Va., rejected by…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Sands & Crump v. Taylor & LovettNew York Supreme Court · 1810
- Alleghany Iron Co. v. TeafordSupreme Court of Virginia · 1898
- Rosenbaums v. Weeden, Johnson & Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1868
- Patten's AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1863
- Randall v. GlennCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1844
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Hardwick v. American Can Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1904
- Walker v. Gateway Milling Co.Court of Appeals of Virginia · 1917
- American Canning Co. v. Flat Top Grocery Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1911
- Gilbert Grocery Co. v. HowellCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1923
- Norman Lumber Co. v. Keystone Manufacturing Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1925
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.