Legal Opinion

Matthew J. Connelly and T. Lamar Caudle v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided December 13, 1957No. 15746PublishedCited by 50 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GARDNER, Chief Judge.

Appellants with one Harry I. Schwimmer were indicted under an indictment which charged them with conspiring to defraud the United States government in violation of Section 371, Title 18, U.S.C. The single count indictment alleged that the purpose of the conspiracy was to defraud the United States of the proper administration of the Internal Revenue laws and regulations, of the proper and faithful service of appellants Connelly and Caudle and to commit the offenses of bribery, perjury and knowingly making false statements and.entries.. The indictment named as…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Glasser v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  2. Opper v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  3. Kwong Hai Chew v. ColdingSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
  4. Lutwak v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
  5. Walder v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1954

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by50 opinions

  1. Paul John Carbo, Frank Palermo, Joseph Sica, Louis Tom Dragna, and Truman K. Gibson, Jr. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1963
  2. Isaacs v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1962
  3. Benjamin Dranow v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1962
  4. Abraham L. Koolish, David F. Koolish and John B. Carnell v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1965
  5. United States v. William Fred PhillipsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1976

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API