Legal Opinion

State v. Houle

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided July 29, 1977No. 46096PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MacLAUGHLIN, Justice.

Defendant, Michael D. Houle, was found guilty by a jury of aggravated robbery and has appealed from the judgment of conviction. Because we find that no prejudicial errors occurred during the course of the trial, we affirm.

Shortly after midnight on October 29, 1974, a man wearing striped bib overalls, a jacket, and a cap on top of a blond, bushy wig held up the Kom On Inn in Duluth, Minnesota. The robber, whose face was covered by a red bandanna, pointed a single-barrel pump shotgun at the bartender and ordered him to empty the till. The man seized the money and ran out…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Roviaro v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. State v. HillSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
  3. State v. LuciowSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
  4. State v. PurdySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1967
  5. State v. SorgSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1966

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. State v. FordSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1995
  2. State v. WileySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
  3. State v. ScruggsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
  4. State v. NorrisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
  5. State v. JonesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API