Legal Opinion
State v. Purdy
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided September 22, 1967No. 40383PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Nelson, Justice.
Appeal from a judgment of conviction of possession of a narcotic drug in violation of Minn. St. 618.02. The following facts in this case are not contested, and the only issues concern the legal conclusions to be drawn from them.
Late in the evening of August 14 or in the early morning of August 15, 1965, the Oakdale Drug Company in Owatonna, Minnesota, was burglarized and a quantity of narcotics, guns, appliances, and other personal property was taken therefrom. Defendant was known to have been in the vicinity at the time of the burglary, as he was apprehended by a Minnesota…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Aguilar v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Jones v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- United States v. VentrescaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Roviaro v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Draper v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- State v. WileySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
- United States v. Doyle Ray SkinnerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1969
- State v. MastrianSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1969
- State v. WileySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1973
- State v. HouleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.