Legal Opinion

United States v. Keith

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided October 17, 2000No. 99-50692PublishedCited by 94 opinions

1Per curiam

Defendant-Appellant Lamont E. Keith appealed his conviction and sentence for possession of cocaine base (crack) with intent to distribute, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(b)(1). We affirmed Keith’s conviction, rejecting his claims of evidentiary insufficiency and failure to give a requested insti’uction on nervousness. United States v. Keith, 211 F.3d 126, 99-50692 (5th Cir. Mar. 9, 2000) (unpublished). Reviewing for plain error, we also rejected Keith’s argument that drug quantity is an element of the offense and must be alleged in the indictment and proved to the jury beyond a reasonable…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Jones v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  3. McMillan v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. United States v. Fabian Aguayo-DelgadoCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2000
  5. United States v. DoggettCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2000

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by94 opinions

  1. United States v. SolisCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2002
  2. United States v. Ignasio Maldenaldo Sanchez, United States of America v. Santiago Gilberto SanchezCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2001
  3. United States v. Francisco D. Pineiro, Also Known as Frank PineiroCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2004
  4. United States v. SlaughterCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2001
  5. United States v. Marc Milton LeachmanCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2002

89 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API