Legal Opinion

Kasner v. Wilson

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided March 7, 1950No. 33620PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHalley, J.

This action involves a strip of land approximately eight feet wide along the south side of lot 1, block 1, Powell’s Place Addition, a subdivision of a portion of Prospect Heights Addition to Oklahoma City, Oklahoma. Lot 2 of block 1 of the same addition lies south of and adjacent to lot 1. These lots face toward the west and reach the east side of Glen Ellyn street. Lot 1 is 25 feet wide, north and south, and lot 2 is 50 feet wide. Dora E. Wilson was plaintiff in the trial court and M. Kasner’ was defendant, and we shall refer to the parties as they appeared there.

The plaintiff, Dora E.…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Hefner v. Northwestern Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
  2. Swan v. KuehnerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
  3. Baird v. StubbinsNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1929
  4. Taylor v. LawrenceSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
  5. Windom v. SchuppelSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1888

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Harrison v. EverettSupreme Court of Colorado · 1957
  2. Krosmico v. PettitSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1998
  3. Adams v. ParksSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1967
  4. Dunlap v. MayerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1959
  5. Sloat v. TurnerNevada Supreme Court · 1977

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API