Legal Opinion

Windom v. Schuppel

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided June 25, 1888PublishedCited by 16 opinions

Actions to determine adverse claims to real property, brought in the district court for Hennepin county, and tried together by Young, J., who ordered judgment for plaintiff in each case. The defendant-in each case appeals from an order refusing a new trial.

1Opinion of the CourtVandeRburgh, J.

The defendants claim title, through certain mesne conveyances, to the land in question, under certain tax-certificates issued to Finnegan and Merritt. It is not, however, claimed that a valid title was acquired by the tax-certificates alone, but as-confirmed by a judgment in favor of Finnegan and Merritt, barring the adverse claim of one Brigham, the grantor of the plaintiff. The plaintiff claims title to the same land under warranty deed executed by Brigham and wife, acknowledged on the 22d day of September, 1869, and dated on the loth day of September, 1869, but not recorded until the 4th…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Hooper v. HenrySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1883
  2. Loomis v. PingreeSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1857
  3. Sanborn v. MuellerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1887
  4. Bennett v. MurtaughSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1873
  5. Jewell v. TruhnSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1888

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Baird v. StubbinsNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1929
  2. Taylor v. LawrenceSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
  3. Burke v. LacockSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1889
  4. Union Central Life Ins. Co. v. PageSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1933
  5. Kasner v. WilsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1950

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API