Legal Opinion

Taylor v. Department of Employment & Training

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided January 30, 1987No. 80, September Term, 1986PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ADKINS, Judge.

This case presents the question of whether an involuntarily unemployed worker, ineligible for retirement, who receives a lump sum retirement payment and rolls it over into an individual retirement account (IRA), is eligible for unemployment compensation benefits. Article 95A, § 6(g) of the Unemployment Insurance Law disqualifies claimants who have received an amount equal to or in excess of the weekly benefit amount in the form of a retirement payment. The appellant, Carlotta M. Taylor, invites us to qualify her for unemployment compensation benefits under § 6(g) by…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Tucker v. Fireman's Fund InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1986
  2. Saunders v. Maryland Unemployment Compensation BoardCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1947
  3. Board of Educ., Mont. Co. v. PaynterCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1985
  4. Maryland Unemployment Compensation Board v. AlbrechtCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1944
  5. Bledsoe v. BledsoeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1982

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Kaczorowski v. Mayor of BaltimoreCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1987
  2. City of College Park v. CotterCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1987
  3. Department of Economic & Employment Development v. TaylorCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1996
  4. Department of Economic & Employment Development v. LilleyCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1995
  5. Westinghouse Electric Corp. v. CallahanCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1995

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API