Legal Opinion
Ideal World Marketing, Inc. v. Duracell, Inc.
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided March 17, 1998No. 1:96-cv-04644PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
BLOCK, District Judge.
In this action for trademark infringement under § 43(a) of the Lanham Trade-Mark Act (“the Lanham Act” or “the Act”), 15 U.S.C. § 1125(a), and for unfair competition under New York common law, defendant Duracell, Inc. (“Duraeell”) moves for an order striking the jury demand contained in the complaint of plaintiff Ideal World Marketing, Inc. (“Ideal World”). Duraeell argues that Ideal World is seeking solely equitable relief from the Court, and that it is therefore not entitled to have this matter tried by a jury. For the reasons that follow,…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- MARKMAN Et Al. v. WESTVIEW INSTRUMENTS, INC., Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Dairy Queen, Inc. v. WoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Tull v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Chauffeurs, Teamsters & Helpers Local No. 391 v. TerrySupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Parsons v. Bedford, Breedlove, & RobesonSupreme Court of the United States · 1830
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Classroomdirect. Com, LLC v. DRAPHIX, LLCSupreme Court of Alabama · 2008
- Lurzer Gmbh v. American Showcase, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1998
- Emmpresa Cubana Del Tabaco v. Culbro Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 2000
- Daisy Group, Ltd. v. Newport News, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1998
- United States v. Philip Morris, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2002
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.