United States v. Ervin
District Court, D. Montana
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING § 2255 MOTION AND SETTING EXPEDITED RE-SENTENCING HEARING
Susan P. Watters, United States District Court
This case comes before the Court on Defendant/Movant Ervin’s motion to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. He seeks relief under Johnson v. United States, — U.S. -, 135 S.Ct. 2551, 192 L.Ed.2d 569 (2015)1, and Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 104 S.Ct. 2052, 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984). The United States opposes Er-vin’s motion.
I. Background
Ervin was charged on March 25, 2013, with one count of distributing hydroco-done, at that time a Schedule…
2Cases cited45 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Murray v. CarrierSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Teague v. LaneSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- United States v. FradySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- United States v. HarrisDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2018
- United States v. CampbellDistrict Court, E.D. Kentucky · 2016
- Brown v. Warden, USP HazeltonDistrict Court, N.D. West Virginia · 2019