Legal Opinion

United States v. Ervin

District Court, D. Montana

Decided July 28, 2016No. Cause No. CR 13-23-BLG-SPW; CV 16-56-BLG-SPWPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER GRANTING § 2255 MOTION AND SETTING EXPEDITED RE-SENTENCING HEARING

Susan P. Watters, United States District Court

This case comes before the Court on Defendant/Movant Ervin’s motion to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. He seeks relief under Johnson v. United States, — U.S. -, 135 S.Ct. 2551, 192 L.Ed.2d 569 (2015)1, and Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 104 S.Ct. 2052, 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984). The United States opposes Er-vin’s motion.

I. Background

Ervin was charged on March 25, 2013, with one count of distributing hydroco-done, at that time a Schedule…

2Cases cited45 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  3. Murray v. CarrierSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Teague v. LaneSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. United States v. FradySupreme Court of the United States · 1982

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. United States v. HarrisDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2018
  2. United States v. CampbellDistrict Court, E.D. Kentucky · 2016
  3. Brown v. Warden, USP HazeltonDistrict Court, N.D. West Virginia · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API