State v. McAdams
Supreme Court of Louisiana
APPEAL from the Twelfth Judicial District, Parish of DeSoto.— Lee, J.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Nicholls, C. J.
J. E. McAdams, Jack Eachal and-Fleming were indicted in the Parish of DeSoto, charging that they, on the 5th of January, 1901, at and in the Parish of DeSoto, unlawfully did keep a grog and tippling shop and retail spirituous liquors without previously obtaining a license so to do from the police jury of DeSoto Parish, and other authorities having the power to issue licenses, contrary to the form of the statutes of Louisiana and against the peace and dignity of the same.
The defendants excepted to the jurisdiction of the court for DeSoto…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited8 opinions
- O'Neil v. VermontSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- People ex rel. Smith v. OldsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1853
- State v. WingfieldSupreme Court of Missouri · 1893
- State v. Intoxicating LiquorsSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1882
- State ex rel. Haab v. MoiseSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1900
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- State v. TobinWyoming Supreme Court · 1924
- Frost-Johnson Lumber Co. v. Nabors Oil & Gas Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1920
- DeSambourg v. BOARD OF COM'RSSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1993
- State v. EasleySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1907
- State v. ShieldsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1903
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.