Legal Opinion

DeSambourg v. BOARD OF COM'RS

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided July 2, 1993No. 93-C-0167PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

621 So.2d 602 (1993)

Warren DeSAMBOURG and Mary DeSambourg

v.

BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS FOR the GRAND PRAIRIE LEVEE DISTRICT.

No. 93-C-0167.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

July 2, 1993.

Rehearing Denied September 2, 1993.

Mack E. Barham, Robert E. Arceneaux, and Matthew K. Brown, Barham & Arceneaux, for applicant.

Jack P. Brook, Norman F. Pizza, and Michael A. Stroud, Brook, Morial, Cassibry & Pizza, for respondent.

ORTIQUE, Justice[1].

We granted writ to determine the meaning of "batture" as it is used in the context of the batture exemption from compensation for the state's appropriation of riparian lands…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited41 opinions

  1. Sistler v. Liberty Mut. Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1990
  2. Virgil v. American Guar. & Liability Ins.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1987
  3. State v. BarrasSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1993
  4. Eldridge v. TrezevantSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  5. State v. RichardsonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1916

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Parm v. ShumateCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2007
  2. South Lafourche Levee District v. Chad M. JarreauSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2017
  3. Vela v. Plaquemines Parish GovernmentLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2002
  4. Borgnemouth Realty Co. v. Parish of St. BernardLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2014
  5. Koepp v. Sea-Land Service, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1994

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API