Legal Opinion
Genesis II Hair Replacement Studio, Ltd. v. Vallar
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided June 10, 1998PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
—Order unanimously affirmed with costs. Memorandum: Supreme Court properly denied plaintiffs motion for a preliminary injunction seeking to enjoin defendant *1083from breaching the terms of restrictive covenants in her employment contract. Defendant was hired by plaintiff in 1989 as a licensed beautician. In September 1997 defendant left plaintiff’s employ and opened a hair salon specializing in hair loss treatment. Plaintiff contends that defendant’s operation of a similar business within 50 miles of plaintiffs studio in North Syracuse violates defendant’s employment contract.
“[RJestrictive…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Reed, Roberts Associates, Inc. v. StraumanNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
- Faberge International, Inc. v. Di PinoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
- Newco Waste Systems, Inc. v. SwartzenbergAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
- Briskin v. All Seasons Services, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
- Ken J. Pezrow Corp. v. SeifertAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Eastman Kodak Co. v. CarmosinoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- Savannah Bank, N. A. v. Savings Bank of FingerlakesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- Technology for Measurement, Inc. v. BriggsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
- Glazer v. BrownAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008