Legal Opinion

Ken J. Pezrow Corp. v. Seifert

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided October 1, 1993PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Supreme Court did not err in denying plaintiffs motion for a preliminary injunction or in granting defendants’ cross motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, which sought to enforce a restrictive covenant contained in an employment agreement between plaintiff and defendant Roger M. Seifert (Seifert) dated July 28, 1987. It is well established that restrictive covenants contained in employment contracts that tend to prevent an employee from pursuing a similar vocation after termination are disfavored in the law (see, Columbia…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Columbia Ribbon & Carbon Manufacturing Co. v. A-1-A Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1977
  2. American Broadcasting Companies, Inc. v. WolfNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
  3. Walter Karl, Inc. v. WoodAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
  4. Kraft Agency, Inc. v. DelmonicoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
  5. Newco Waste Systems, Inc. v. SwartzenbergAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Pure Power Boot Camp, Inc. v. Warrior Fitness Boot Camp, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2011
  2. Poller v. BioScrip, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2013
  3. Lumex, Inc. v. HighsmithDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1996
  4. Briskin v. All Seasons Services, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
  5. Skaggs-Walsh, Inc. v. ChmielAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API