Apollo Sheet Metal, Inc. v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
MILLER, Judge.
This matter is before the court on defendant’s motion to dismiss. The issues under consideration are (1) whether certain maps drawn by the government and included within a permit application constitute design specifications, and (2) if so, whether an order of precedence clause negates the attendant implied warranty of suitability. Argument is deemed unnecessary.
FACTS
The following facts are not disputed. On June 26,1996, the U.S. Department of Interi- or’s Bureau of Reclamation (the “BOR”) awarded a contract to Apollo Sheet Metal, Inc. (“plaintiff’), for construction of the…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- United States v. SpearinSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
- Gould, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1991
- Stuyvesant Dredging Company v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
- J. L. Simmons Company, Inc. v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1969
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- West Bay Builders, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2008
- Manuel Bros. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2002
- 4dd Holdings, LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2022
- Treadwell Corporation v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2019