Legal Opinion

In re Tucker

California Supreme Court

Decided January 26, 1966No. Crim. No. 8251PublishedCited by 59 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPeek, J.

By his application for the writ of habeas corpus Forrest S. Tucker, an inmate of Folsom Prison, seeks relief from the determination that he is an habitual criminal within the terms of subdivision (a) of section 644 of the Penal Code. He also challenges the quality of the representation afforded him by court-appointed counsel on appeal and urges that we recall the remittitur and reinstate his appeal.

The certified abstract of judgment reveals that on November 27, 1953, a judgment of multiple convictions pursuant to jury verdicts was entered against petitioner for four counts of first-degree…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Douglas v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. Betts v. BradySupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  5. Rice v. OlsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by59 opinions

  1. United States v. TuckerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. People v. CoffeyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
  3. People v. HortonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
  4. People v. MerriamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
  5. People v. SumstineCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984

54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API