Legal Opinion

Bossert v. City of Okmulgee

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided July 22, 1953No. A-11822PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPowell, P. J.

The plaintiff in error, Mary J. Bossert, who will hereinafter be referred to as defendant, was charged by complaint filed in the municipal court of Okmulgee with solicitation of orders for the sale of photographs in violation of city Ordinance No. 860; was found guilty and fined the sum of $19, and $1 cost. The defendant appealed to the county court of Okmulgee county, and her case was tried before the court without a jury on the 12th day of June, 1952, and she was again found guilty, and with the same fine being assessed as previously. Appeal has been perfected to this court.

Counsel for the…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Robbins v. Shelby County Taxing DistrictSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
  2. McGoldrick v. Berwind-White Coal Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
  3. Nippert v. City of RichmondSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  4. Real Silk Hosiery Mills v. City of PortlandSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  5. Crenshaw v. ArkansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1913

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. Olan Mills, Inc.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1955
  2. Olan Mills, Inc. v. City of Cape GirardeauSupreme Court of Missouri · 1954
  3. Mills v. Town of KingstreeSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1960
  4. Mathis v. City of TulsaCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1953
  5. City of Watertown v. HagySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API