Legal Opinion
City of Watertown v. Hagy
South Dakota Supreme Court
Decided June 16, 1970No. File No. 10600Published
1Opinion of the Court
HANSON, Judge.
Defendant was found guilty of violating an ordinance of the City of Watertown relating to the regulation and licensing of transient and itinerant photographers. On appeal he asserts the unconstitutionality of the ordinance. The City of Watertown failed to appear or file a brief in opposition.
The challenged ordinance is as follows:
“12.0301: LICENSE REQUIRED.
It shall be unlawful for any person to engage in the business of a transient or itinerant photographer, canvasser or solicitor of photographs or pictures or enlargements of the same, taken, photographed or otherwise made,…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Nippert v. City of RichmondSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Real Silk Hosiery Mills v. City of PortlandSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Memphis Steam Laundry Cleaner, Inc. v. StoneSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Ralph v. City of WenatcheeWashington Supreme Court · 1949
- Nicholson v. City of Forrest CitySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1950
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.